Shay Mitchell’s T-Shirt Dress Goes From Casual to Risky Amid Baywatch Shoot

Shay Mitchellgarnered widespread attention from netizens with her latestInstagrampost, where she rocked anNBA t-shirt dress. In the photos, her attire complemented her cool, collected aura. These images come amid the actress's shoot for the Baywatch reboot, where she is set to play a key role opposite Stephen Amell.

Shay Mitchell stuns in new pictures

Check out Shay Mitchell's NBA t-shirt dress in the Instagram snaps below:

As seen in the images, the Pretty Little Liars alum paired her black NBA jersey with red-and-white striped sheer stockings. She accessorized with a black leather handbag, inside which she placed her white earphones (which in one photo hung out from the zipper), blue-framed sunglasses, and gold earrings.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, she slicked back the top portion of her black hair while letting the lower part flow naturally. She also sported makeup, including red blush, eyeshadow, dark pink lipstick, and red nail polish.

Mitchell's look garnered positive reactions from her followers. "You look so gorgeous in that outfit, Shay!!," a user commented. "Obsessed!!," another added. Further, two of her costars from the Baywatch reboot also expressed awe. "Good lord girl!!!!," Hassie Harrison wrote. Meanwhile, Livvy Dunne exclaimed, "Beyond hot!!!"

Originally reported by Abdul Azim Naushad onMandatory.

The postShay Mitchell's T-Shirt Dress Goes From Casual to Risky Amid Baywatch Shootappeared first onReality Tea.

Shay Mitchell’s T-Shirt Dress Goes From Casual to Risky Amid Baywatch Shoot

Shay Mitchellgarnered widespread attention from netizens with her latestInstagrampost, where she rocked anNBA t-shirt dress. In the photos,...
Justin Hartley's 'Tracker' Promotes Star in Season 3 After Numerous Shocking Cast Exits

Justin Hartley'sTrackerpromoted a cast member after numerous exits ahead of season 3.

Us magazine See Justin Hartley's Hottest Moments as Colter on CBS' Hit Series 'Tracker'

It was confirmed thatChris Lee,who plays Randy, is now a series regular, according to Deadline. He first joined the show in season 2 as Bobby's (Eric Graise) cousin before returning in a larger capacity.

CBS found success withTrackerimmediately after it premiered in February 2024 to record-breaking ratings. Viewers have since tuned in week after week to see fictional survivalist Colter (Hartley) travel the country to help solve various missing persons cases.

As Colter has gotten help,the ensemble cast has grownwith their respective characters, such as handlers Teddi (Robin Weigert) and Velma, hacker Bobby and attorney Reenie. After joiningTrackerin season 1, Weigert's character was written off in the premiere with her wife, Velma, admitting that they needed some distance. Velma then started working with Reenie and Teddi wasn't discussed again in season 2.

Justin Hartley's Rare Comments About 'Tracker' Losing Multiple Series Regulars Amid Cast Reconfiguration

"[Teddi] is going to be there for a while. She is helping her mom get sorted. I was getting in the way you might say and it really wasn't good," Velma said at the beginning of season 2. "So I came back. Don't you worry because I am keeping busy."

The concerns about the show's main characters kept coming when Graise was noticeably absent from six episodes. His cousin Randy was brought in to help Colter before Bobby returned, which caused backlash from viewers who grew used to seeing Graise on their screen.

News later broke thatGraise and McEnany wouldn't becoming back — at least for now.

Advertisement

Justin Hartley's Colter Confuses Randy for Bobby After 'Tracker' Absence

"I do think it's evolving. If I can't evolve those characters — Randy or Reenie or Bobby — they're not just people that just pick up the phone and go, 'OK, here is the answer.' That's when the show is phoning it in," executive producerElwood Reidexclusively toldUs Weeklyin May 2025. "The challenge is when you got to learn about them, which I thought was interesting. That's the challenge of the show is not having it fall into a formula."

Reid noted that theydidn't wantTrackerto "fall into complacency."

"The only rule I really have of the show is each week Colter is going to come to a new place and there's going to be a new case. How he gets those answers and what he uses on the team, that's all something that's up for grabs," Reid teased. "Meeting these [local] weird characters is something we're going to try to do more of as the season goes on. Just Colter coming in and interacting with other characters. That's fun to see Justin flex those muscles with really good guest cast members."

Ahead of season 3, Reid defended the decision to shake up season 3.

Which 'Tracker' Stars Are — And Aren't — Returning for Season 4 of Justin Hartley's Show After Cast Exits?

"Justin has to carry so much of the show. So I don't want the other characters that are in the show to just be phone-a-friend where whenever he's in trouble, he just picks up the phone. The challenge in season 3 has been how do we build actual good story out of [it]," Reid teased.

Reidpointed out that Reenie and Randyare still in the picture.

"Reenie takes a lot of the guilt [from her season 2 case] on and she's brought Randy up there to fix it. You get to see them in the office. That forms a good bond between those two. Then we're going to bring in another character as she tries to expand her law office a little bit. That will be interesting," he continued. "It's just building out those story lines. The challenge we set up for ourselves this season was to build out those people's world a little bit."

Reid added: "It's about trying to get a little bit of lightness [into the show] because sometimes Colter is doing some really dark and heavy stuff. It's life or death."

Trackerairs on CBS Sundays at 9 p.m. ET before streaming the next day on Paramount+.

Justin Hartley’s ‘Tracker’ Promotes Star in Season 3 After Numerous Shocking Cast Exits

Justin Hartley'sTrackerpromoted a cast member after numerous exits ahead of season 3. It was confirmed tha...
Amy Duggar Speculates How Jim Bob Duggar Would Have Reacted to Joseph Duggar's Arrest

Amy Duggar Kingis speculating about how she thinks her uncleJim Bob Duggarwould have reacted to the news of his sonJoseph Duggarbeing arrested.

Us magazine GettyImages-1071897828Amy-Duggar-Guesses-How-Jim-Bob-Duggar-Reacted-to-Joseph-Duggar-Arrest.jpg

Postingvia her TikTok accounton Friday, March 27, Amy, 39, said she "would almost take bets" that Jim Bob immediately "called a family meeting" or "texted on a big family group chat" when the news broke. (Joseph, 31,was arrestedon March 18 on child molestation charges.)

Amy guessed that Jim Bob may have encouragedthe familyto rally together amid the scandal.

She thinks Jim Bob would have said something like, "'Alright, I'm so sorry that we're going through this again as a family. What's most important is that we band together and that we show family loyalty and that we love each other no matter what. And right now, we need to just be closer than ever. Including our social media.'"

Amy Duggar Cries Hearing Cousin Joseph's Wife Kendra Was Also Arrested: 'Don't Know What's Going On'

Amy added that she thinks Jim Bob would have encouraged his children to continue to "post about your life, post about recipes, post about your kids, post about whatever" but she thought he would have told them to  "don't mention Joseph."

Continuing her impression of Jim Bob, Amy said she thinks her uncle would have instructed family members to pass on any interview requests to his team to deal with and "just don't add anything extra to it."

Joseph is the seventh ofJim BobandMichelle Duggar's19 children. The pair also shareJosh, Jana, John-David, Jill, Jessa, Jinger, Josiah, Joy-Anna, Jedidiah, Jeremiah, Jason, James, Justin, Jackson, Johannah, Jennifer, Jordyn-GraceandJosie. The family's life was featured on the TLC series19 Kids and Countingas well as the spin-off,Counting On. Amy also appeared on19 Kids and Counting.

♬ original sound - Amy Duggar King

Jim Bob and Michelle's  eldest son, Josh, was sentenced in May 2022 to 12 years in prison for possession of child pornography.

Advertisement

Joseph was arrested last weekon suspicion of lewd and lascivious behavior involving molestation of a victim less than 12 years old and lewd and lascivious behavior conducted by a person 18 years or older. A 14-year-old girl came forward with accusations that Joseph molested her when they were on vacation in Panama City Beach, Florida, when she was 9 years old in 2020.

Us Weeklyconfirmed days later that Joseph's wife,Kendra Duggar,was arrested on March 20. She was released that same day on a $1,470 bond.

Joseph and Kendra, 27, are also both facing charges of endangering the welfare of a minor and four counts of second-degree false imprisonment.

A spokesperson for the Duggar family toldUsin a statement, "[Kendra's] is a misdemeanor charge totally unrelated to the Florida case."

Amy Duggar Reveals Last Time She Spoke With Cousin Joseph and His Wife Kendra Before Arrests

Amy initially shared prayers for Joseph's wife Kendra in the wake of her cousin's arrest.

"Recognizing that we do not yet know the full picture, I am also praying for Joseph's wife, Kendra, as she begins to process this, and for the protection of their children," Amy originally said in a statement on March 19. "I'm praying for eyes to be opened and above all, I pray that justice will be served to the fullest."

However,she recanted the statementonce Kendra was also arrested.

"I think that was a plot twist that no one saw coming," Amy toldTMZon March 21. "When I gave that [first] statement … that was just the information I was given at the time and thought to be true. Now that the information has changed and there's more that is coming out and there's a lot of question marks right now."

If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted, contact theNational Sexual Assault Hotlineat 1-800-656-HOPE (4673). If you or someone you know is experiencing child abuse, call or textChild Help Hotlineat 1-800-422-4453.

Amy Duggar Speculates How Jim Bob Duggar Would Have Reacted to Joseph Duggar’s Arrest

Amy Duggar Kingis speculating about how she thinks her uncleJim Bob Duggarwould have reacted to the news of his sonJoseph...
Analysis-One month into Iran war, only hard choices for Trump

By Matt Spetalnick, Nandita Bose and Humeyra Pamuk

Reuters

WASHINGTON, March 28 (Reuters) - With global energy prices up and his job approval ratings down, Donald Trump faces stark choices after a month of war against Iran: cut a potentially flawed deal and get out, or escalate militarily and risk a prolonged conflict that could consume his presidency.

Despite a flurry of diplomatic activity, Trump ends another week of the joint U.S.-Israeli campaign struggling to contain a widening Middle East crisis as a defiant Iran maintains a chokehold on Gulf oil and gas shipments and continues missile and drone strikes across the ‌region.

The central question now, say analysts, is whether Trump is ready to wind down or ramp up what critics have called a war of choice, one that has ignited the worst global energy supply shock in history and spread far beyond the region.

Trump has told aides he wants to avoid a "forever war" ‌and find a negotiated exit, urging them to stress the four-to-six-week duration of hostilities he has outlined publicly, a senior White House official said, adding that such a timeline appears "shaky."

At the same time, Trump has threatened a major military escalation if talks fail.

Trump's diplomatic overtures to Iran, including a 15-point peace proposal sent via a backchannel with Pakistan, appeared to demonstrate an increasingly urgent search for an off-ramp. But it remains unclear ​whether there are currently any realistic prospects for fruitful negotiations.

"President Trump has poor options all around to end the war," said Jonathan Panikoff, former U.S. deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East. "Part of the challenge is the lack of clarity related to what a satisfactory outcome would be."

A White House official insisted that the Iran campaign "will conclude when the commander-in-chief determines that our objectives are met" and that Trump had laid out explicit goals.

STRUGGLING TO CONTAIN EXPANDING WAR

Apparently hedging his bets, Trump is deploying thousands more U.S. troops to the region and warning Iran of an intensified onslaught, possibly including the use of ground troops, if it does not yield to his demands.

Analysts say such a show of force could be aimed at creating leverage for concessions from Tehran but risks drawing the U.S. into a more protracted conflict, with any commitment of boots on Iranian soil likely to anger many American voters.

Another possible scenario, experts say, would be for the U.S. to wage a final major air assault in "Operation Epic Fury" to further degrade Iran's military capabilities and nuclear sites, after which Trump would declare victory ‌and walk away, saying his war objectives had been achieved.

But such a claim would ring hollow unless the vital Strait ⁠of Hormuz is completely reopened, which Iran is so far refusing to allow. Trump has voiced frustration over European allies' refusal to send warships to help secure the waterway.

Trump, who has repeatedly vowed to keep the U.S. out of foreign conflicts, is seemingly struggling to contain the expanding war that he started along with Israel.

Even as he has continued issuing triumphalist assessments, he has increasingly geared his messaging to reassuring nervous financial markets, pressing senior aides to emphasize that the war will be over soon, according to the senior White House official, ⁠who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

But the lack of a clear exit strategy carries dangers both for Trump's presidential legacy and his party's prospects as Republicans scramble to defend narrow majorities in Congress in the November midterm elections.

Trump's biggest miscalculation has been the extent of Tehran's retaliation. It has used its remaining missiles and drones to strike Israel and neighboring Gulf states and mostly close the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit for one-fifth of the world's oil, sending shockwaves through the global economy.

"The Iranian government's bet is they can take more pain for longer than their adversaries, and they might be right," said Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank in Washington.

The White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Trump and ​his ​team were "well-prepared" for Iran's response in the strait and are confident it will reopen soon.

Even so, the clearest sign of Trump's growing anxiety about the war came on Monday with his dramatic climbdown ​from a threat to destroy Iran's power grid if it did not allow shipping to resume through the strait.

In a move widely ‌seen as intended to calm markets, he declared a five-day pause in carrying out his threat in order to give diplomacy a chance. On Thursday, he extended that for another 10 days.

Advertisement

At the same time, pressure is building at home.

Opinion polls show the war is overwhelmingly unpopular with Americans, and while Trump's MAGA movement has mostly stood with him, his grip on his political base could weaken if the economic impact, including high gas prices, persists.

Trump's overall approval rating has fallen to 36%, the lowest since his return to the White House, a Reuters/Ipsos poll completed on Monday found.

The White House has grown increasingly worried about the political fallout from the war, a former senior Trump administration official told Reuters, citing concerns expressed by Republican lawmakers about the coming midterm elections.

In an indication of growing Republican disquiet, U.S. Representative Mike Rogers, chair of the House Armed Services Committee, criticized the administration on Thursday for not providing enough information on the scope of the Iran campaign.

Pushing back, the White House official said Trump aides had briefed Congress numerous times before and during the war.

FRAUGHT DIPLOMACY COMPLICATED BY KILLINGS

For now, however, the diplomatic path offers no easy solutions.

The 15-point plan put forth by Trump is similar to what Iran had mostly rejected in pre-war negotiations and includes some elements that would be hard to enforce. The demands range from dismantling Iran's nuclear program and curbing its missile arsenal to abandoning its proxy ‌groups and effectively handing over control of the strait.

Iran called the U.S. offer unfair and unrealistic - though it did not rule out further indirect contacts.

While Trump insisted on Thursday that Iran was "begging" ​to reach a deal, the country's rulers appear in no rush to negotiate an end to the conflict, analysts say, since they believe they will be in a position to claim victory simply by surviving.

Complicating ​any diplomatic effort has been the replacement of some leaders killed in U.S.-Israeli airstrikes with even more hardline successors, analysts say. The rulers have made clear their ​distrust of Trump, who twice in the past year has launched airstrikes while both sides were still negotiating.

"The president is willing to listen, but if they fail to accept the reality of the current moment, they will be hit harder than ever before," said the White House ‌official.

Israeli officials, meanwhile, have signaled unease that Trump might make concessions that could tie their hands in further strikes against Iran.

Washington's ​Gulf allies may also resent a hasty U.S. exit, given they could be left with ​a wounded, hostile neighbor.

CONTRADICTORY SIGNALS KEEP OPPONENTS OFF-BALANCE

If Trump is indeed prepared to deploy ground forces, he could take over Iran's Kharg Island oil hub or other strategic islands, mount operations along its coast or send special forces for what would be a complex attempt to seize its stockpile of highly enriched uranium believed mostly buried underground by U.S.-Israeli bombing last June.

Such moves could spiral into a broader conflict evoking echoes of the long-running wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that Trump has promised the U.S. would never be dragged into on his watch. They would also risk increased American casualties and raise more questions about U.S. mission ​objectives.

Gulf allies have warned the administration not to put U.S. troops on the ground in Iran, saying it could trigger more ‌retaliation from Tehran, possibly against their energy and civilian infrastructure, a senior Gulf official said on condition of anonymity.

The White House official said Trump had made clear "he has no plans to send ground troops anywhere at this time," but added that he always keeps all options on the table.

For now, ​Trump is keeping the world guessing, one moment making pronouncements aimed at soothing volatile markets and in the next issuing threats that spike energy prices.

"Trump traffics in contradictory signals," said Laura Blumenfeld of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington. "He is a one-man 'fog of war' messaging ​machine to keep opponents off-balance."

(Reporting By Matt Spetalnick, Nandita Bose and Humeyra Pamuk; Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal; Writing by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Don Durfee and Daniel Wallis)

Analysis-One month into Iran war, only hard choices for Trump

By Matt Spetalnick, Nandita Bose and Humeyra Pamuk WASHINGTON, March 28 (Reuters) - With global energy prices ...
Seven islands that hold the keys to the Strait of Hormuz

With thousands of US ground troops reportedly on the way to the Middle East, speculation is mounting that they may be assigned to takeIran's Kharg Island, a key fuel hub in the northern Persian Gulf which handles 90% of Tehran's oil exports.

CNN FILE PHOTO: An aerial view of the island of Qeshm, separated from the Iranian mainland by the Clarence Strait, on December 10, 2023. - Nicolas Economou/Reuters

But Kharg is just one of dozens of Iranian islands in the gulf, and others may be more important to securing the safe passage of ships – and naval vessels – through the Strait of Hormuz.

Seven of these islands – Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, Lesser Tunb, Hengam, Qeshm, Larak and Hormuz – form what researchers at Sun Yat-sen University in Zhuhai, China, call Iran's "arch defense."

"A hypothetical curve connecting these islands would further help to understand Iran's strategic superiority in controlling the security" of the Hormuz strait, Iranian researcher Enayatollah Yazdani and Chinese researcher Ma Yanzhe wrote in a 2022 paper for the Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb – the smallest of the seven and at the western end of the arch – are key to strait control, the two researchers wrote.

Because of the limited distance between them and the depth of the water in the largely shallow gulf, "large warships and tankers are forced to walk past" the three islands, the researchers said. That can make them easy targets for Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) fast-attack boats, mine layers, or drones operating from those islands.

Iranian officials have referred to them and other gulf islands as Tehran's "stationary and unsinkable aircraft carriers," Yazdani and Ma wrote.

Last year, the IRGC said it was reinforcing its presence on Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb, according to a report from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

"Our tactical approach dictates that we must arm and operationalize this group of islands. We have the capability to strike enemy bases, warships, and assets in the region," IRGC navy commander Rear Adm. Alireza Tangsiri said at the time. (Tangsiri has now beenkilled in an Israeli operation, Israel and US Central Command said Thursday.)

Because the islands are unsinkable, Iranian military positions on them would have to be eliminated to ensure the safe passage of US warships – potentially those carrying US Marine Expeditionary Units (MEUs) – into the heart of the Persian Gulf, if a landing were to be attempted on Kharg Island.

The islands are "strategically located to control any shipping" trying to leave or enter the gulf, said Hawaii-based analyst Carl Schuster, a former director of the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center.

There is no timeline for possible US amphibious assaults on any of Iran's islands.

US President Donald Trump said Thursday he was extending a deadline for initiating strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure for 10 days to April 6, to see if a deal could be reached with Tehran to end the fighting. An earlier deadline was set to expire Friday evening, Eastern time.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters "progress has been made" in the negotiations with Iran.

But no pause was announced in the overall military campaign. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Thursday the US would continue "negotiating with bombs."

CNN has reported that elements of twoMEUs– with around 4,000 troops – are on their way to the Middle East. Additionally, some 1,000 troops of the US Army's82nd Airborne Divisionhave been alerted to deploy.

Schuster said the full might of these units may be needed to take control of Iran's key defensive islands. "I would use two MEUs to ensure overwhelming force," he told CNN.

Getting US troops on the islands would happen in one of two ways – air or sea.

The US Navy ships carry landing craft, including LCACs (Landing Craft Air Cushioned) that can slide up onto beaches to disembark troops and their equipment. But getting them inside the gulf could be a problem as their motherships would have to get past possible Iranian defenses on islands earlier in the curve – Hormuz, Larak, Qeshm and Hengam – as well as on the Iranian mainland.

CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton on Thursday said Larak, at the eastern entrance to the strait, presents a problem for naval vessels trying to get into the gulf.

With missiles or small attack craft launched from Larak, "(Iran) could cut off anything that's going through the strait. This is a critical military target," he told CNN's Erin Burnett.

The Navy ships also bring CV-22 Osprey tilt-rotor aircraft that can perform vertical takeoffs and landings along with helicopters. But those aircraft are slow-moving and vulnerable to air defenses that earlier airstrikes may have missed.

Troops from the 82nd Airborne could parachute onto the islands from higher-flying aircraft, but such an assault would come with less equipment than can be transported by sea.

Advertisement

An 82nd Airborne Division paratrooper participates in artillery training during a field exercise at Fort Bragg, N.C., on August 26, 2020. - Sarah Blake Morgan/AP

All in all, assaults on the islands could take two days to two weeks to complete, but yield important results, if successful, Schuster said.

"Take it, put a radar and some troops on it, you can monitor activity in the strait while denying Iran a staging area for drones and so forth," Schuster said, of Abu Musa.

A March 24 report from the Institute for the Study of War said US and/or Israeli warplanes had begun attacking Iranian military infrastructure, including aircraft hangars, ports and warehouses on Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb – the kind of attacks Schuster said would come before an amphibious invasion.

But taking the islands is just one part of the task. An occupational force of about 1,800 to 2,000 troops would be required to ensure the islands could not be used by the Iranians again, Schuster said.

And that could leave the occupying US troops vulnerable.

"Controlling any of these territories will also require U.S. forces to prevent drone, missile, and artillery attacks from the Iranian mainland, potentially embroiling the U.S. in a longer-term, unpopular engagement on Iranian territory, accompanied by escalating U.S. casualties," said a new report from the Soufan Center, a New York-based nonpartisan analysis organization.

Schuster called drone and missile defense vital for any US troops on the three Iranian islands.

"If (Iran) has the drones and ballistic missiles available, it will pound any hostile force on those islands," he said.

But Schuster sees advantages in trying to take the three islands in the lower gulf rather than Kharg, the oil center, in the upper part.

"There is less risk of damaging a future Iranian government's economy," he said.

Because most of Iran's oil flows through Kharg, a fight that damages any of its oil infrastructure could set postwar recovery back years as it's rebuilt.

Iranian attacks on Qatar's liquified natural gas facilities earlier this month caused damage that could take up to five years to repair, QatarEnergy officials said.

But analysts said US action to take Abu Musa and Greater and Lesser Tunb could have post-war repercussions, too.

In 1971, Iran, then ruled by the US-supported Shah, took control of the islands as the United Arab Emirates gained independence from colonial Britain.

The UAE has since challenged Tehran's actions as illegal at the United Nations, and offered to negotiate a settlement of the dispute.

Iran claims it has a historical and geographic right to the islands. The UAE says it may take the dispute to the International Court of Justice, if the matter can't be resolved.

The US and other nations have been supportive of the UAE in its claim, the UAE Embassy in Washington said in a statement.

And that's where any US seizure of the islands becomes tricky, Schuster said, calling it a "political dilemma" for Washington with its UAE ally.

If the US returns the island to any new Iranian government, it risks angering the UAE, said Schuster. But he added that if the US returns them to the UAE, it could undermine any perceived legitimacy of the new Iranian regime.

Of course, that's only a problem if the US succeeds in retaining any seized islands at the end of the conflict. But Schuster said it is something that planners need to consider because it's the kind of dispute that could see fighting flare anew.

"This is why modern military planning is so complex," he said.

"Every option has a negative impact. There are no perfect plans or solutions. There is only a balance among costs, risks and impact, both intended and unintended."

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Seven islands that hold the keys to the Strait of Hormuz

With thousands of US ground troops reportedly on the way to the Middle East, speculation is mounting that they may be ass...
What history reveals about Trump's move to limit birthright citizenship

WASHINGTON – TheSupreme Courtin 1898 upheld the citizenship of a San Francisco-born son of Chinese citizens, despite a national backlash to the Chinese migrants who helped build the transcontinental railway and contributed other grueling labor to an expanding nation.

USA TODAY

Forty-five years after Wong Kim Ark's victory, the justices were pushed – after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor – to overturn that ruling and revoke citizenship for Japanese Americans born in the United States.

Now, the court isagain being asked to decidewho is an American citizen by birth as immigration has returned as a major cultural and political divide.

The justices on April 1 will debate PresidentDonald Trump'spolicythat children of parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily are not entitled to citizenship, an issue that was central to his 2024 campaign.

The birthright citizenship case, Trump v. Barbara, shows the continuing tension in the country between America's foundation as a nation of immigrants and periods of backlash.

"I think that this country has always had an ongoing debate about what our immigration policies should be and this issue, for better or worse, has often been connected to those broader debates," said Amanda Tyler, a constitutional law scholar at University of California, Berkeley School of Law.

More:Will the majority-Catholic Supreme Court listen to the church on immigration?

Lawyer fighting Trump owes citizenship to 14th Amendment

Cecillia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who is going up against the Trump administration at the high court, is well aware of the history – and her place in it.

Wang said her American citizenship was made possible by the 14thAmendment's birthright citizenship guarantee and by changes to laws that had restricted Asian immigration.

Without those changes, she said, her parents may not have been able to come to the United States from Taiwan to attend graduate school. And because they had not yet become naturalized citizens when she was born, her citizenship turned on the 14thAmendment.

"To have a Chinese American legal director of the ACLU standing up to defend what Wong Kim Ark and his bravery helped to establish just goes to show how Wong Kim Ark and the 14thAmendment have shaped the America that we all live in today," said Cody Wofsy, a lawyer with the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project.

Olga Urbina and her child Ares Webster from Baltimore, MD, demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

What is the 14th Amendment?

The 14thAmendment − one of a trio of constitutional amendments adopted after the Civil War − overrode the Supreme Court's infamous 1857 Dred Scott decision that African Americans could not be citizens.

But the citizenship clause isn't limited to the status of Black people.

The amendment states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Some lawmakers opposed that language because they didn't want Chinese people born in the United States to become citizens, said Sandra Reirson, a constitutional law professor at Western State College of Law.

Fourteen years later, Congress passed a Chinese Exclusion Act, the first time Congress enacted legislation limiting immigration based on race or nationality.

That was the backdrop for the Supreme Court's consideration of Wong Kim Ark's status.

Who was Wong Kim Ark?

Born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents who were barred from becoming citizens and later returned home, Wong traveled to China for a temporary visit in 1894.

When he sailed back to California, Wong was not allowed to set foot on U.S. soil.

The federal government argued to the Supreme Court that "Wong Kim Ark was trying to use the 14thAmendment to get around the intent that Congress had clearly signaled when enacting the Chinese Exclusion Act," said César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, an expert on immigration law at Ohio State University College of Law.

But the court ruled that the 14thAmendment's protections extend to the children of "resident aliens" of "whatever race or color, domiciled within the United States."

Rierson, who has written for the Georgetown Immigration Law Journal about the role of white supremacy in the birthright citizenship debate, said it's notable that the Supreme Court sided with Wong Kim Ark despite the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Advertisement

"The case was decided at a time when there was a tremendous degree of nativism and racism directed against the Chinese," she said, "and the Supreme Court nevertheless said `That has nothing to do with this. This is about what the 14thAmendment means.'"

People demonstrate outside the Supreme Court before justices hears oral arguments in Trump v. CASA, Inc. At issue in the case is if the Supreme Court should stay the district courts' nationwide preliminary injunctions on the Trump administration's executive order ending birthright citizenship.

Birthright citizenship again debated during WWII

A similar argument was made against Japanese Americans during World War II.

In 1942, as the government was forcibly relocating and incarcerating Japanese Americans on the West Coast, a nativist group hoped to revoke the citizenship of Japanese Americans born in the United States. The lawyer for the Native Sons of the Golden West called the Wong Kim Ark decision "one of the most injurious and unfortunate decisions every rendered."

"A Japanese born in the United States is still a Japanese," the group argued in a filing.

The 9thCircuit Court of Appeals rejected the challenge in the middle of oral arguments, even while ruling against the civil rights of Japanese American citizens in other cases considered at the same time.

And the Supreme Court declined to get involved.

Tyler, who detailed the history of the case in a filing opposing Trump's policy, said she wanted to "put the current case in context against the long arc of what has been a long-accepted principle – that of birthright citizenship."

Even when the federal government was "literally incarcerating Japanese Americans based on nothing other than their ancestry," Tyler said, "no one seriously disputed the citizenship of Japanese Americans born on United States soil."

Shiger Yabu, Irene Yabu and Prentiss Uchida participate in the signing of a WWII-era flag during an event in Camarillo, Calif., on Monday, June 28, 2021. The event invited internment camp survivors to sign the flag for donation to the Japanese American Museum in San Jos, Calif.

Trump campaigned on limiting birthright citizenship

In the current case, Trump argues the 14thAmendment has long been misinterpreted, creating a powerful incentive for immigrants to enter the country illegally.

Curbing immigration − Trump's top domestic priority − dominated every night of the 2024 Republican National Convention and was a major focus of his ad campaign.Trump signed an executive orderon the first day of his second term directing federal agencies not to recognize the citizenship of babies born in the U.S. who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident.

More:Trump wants to end birthright citizenship. How many people would that impact?

During his acceptance speech, Trump said a "massive invasion" at the southern border had spread misery, crime, poverty, disease, and destruction throughout the United States.

"Today, our cities are flooded with illegal aliens," he said. "Americans are being squeezed out of the labor force and their jobs are taken."

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention on July 18, 2024.

Waxing and waning on immigration

Americans have gone back and forth on immigration, depending in part on the strength of the economy and on how many immigrants are coming in, said Stephen Yale-Loehr, a longtime immigration law scholar and retired Cornell Law School professor.

The last time the country saw immigration at the current scale was in the early 1900s, when Congress responded by imposing quotas.

Yale-Loehr also noted that Trump's campaign promise to restrict immigration came after PresidentJoe Bidenallowed more than two million migrants into the country under humanitarian programs.

"When citizens see that number of immigrants coming to the United States in such a short period of time, they start to worry," he said.

Migrants crossed the Rio Grande and approach the Texas National Guard to enquire when they will be allowed to be processed by Customs and Border Protection to seek asylum in El Paso, Texas on Dec. 20, 2022

Competing strains of American identity

Biden, who faced record numbers of migrants at the border, was trying to address the fact that both legal and illegal immigration is rising globally because of civil conflicts and climate change. And with the issue being so politically explosive, the two parties haven't been able to agree since 1990 on how to manage the situation.

"If we had a functioning immigration system," Yale-Loehr said, "we could better deal with the numbers of people who are trying to come to the United States."

Reirson, the Western State College of Law professor, said the nation's founding ideals of pluralism and equal opportunity have often clashed with an undercurrent of nativism and white supremacy.

"All along," she said, "we have these competing strains for American identity that kind of wax and wane over time."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Trump wants to limit birthright citizenship. What history has shown.

What history reveals about Trump’s move to limit birthright citizenship

WASHINGTON – TheSupreme Courtin 1898 upheld the citizenship of a San Francisco-born son of Chinese citizens, despite a na...
No. 1 UConn wins low-scoring fight vs. North Carolina to reach Elite Eight

Sarah Strong's 21-point, 10-rebound effort propelled top-seeded UConn to a 63-42 victory against fourth-seeded North Carolina in the Fort Worth Regional 1 semifinal of the NCAA Tournament Friday in Fort Worth, Texas.

Field Level Media

Blanca Quinonez shot 7-for-11 for 16 points off the bench and Azzi Fudd had 10 points and five assists to boost the Huskies, who made only 4 of 20 shots from 3-point range in their lowest-scoring game of the season. They scored at least 71 points in every other game.

The defending champions won their 53rd game in a row. UConn (37-0) will face sixth-seeded Notre Dame, a 67-64 winner against second-seeded Vanderbilt in the early game, in Sunday's regional final.

Indya Nivar had team highs of 20 points, eight rebounds and four steals for North Carolina (28-8), which shot 28.3% from the field and committed 24 turnovers.

Advertisement

The Huskies led 28-20 at halftime, scoring the last five points in the final 90 seconds of the second quarter. Strong, with 13 points by the break, and Quinonez (11) supplied all but four points in the half for UConn. Nivar had 11 points and six rebounds by the break.

UConn then scored the first 12 points of the third quarter and carried a 48-25 lead into the fourth.

The teams combined to make only three of the game's first 18 shots, with UConn going 1-for-9. North Carolina led 12-11 at the end of the first quarter despite committing seven turnovers compared to none charged to the Huskies.

The Tar Heels held a 17-11 rebounding edge in that frame and a 45-38 edge by game's end.

--Field Level Media

No. 1 UConn wins low-scoring fight vs. North Carolina to reach Elite Eight

Sarah Strong's 21-point, 10-rebound effort propelled top-seeded UConn to a 63-42 victory against fourth-seeded Nor...

 

COSMO NEWS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com