New Photo - Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts answer burning questions

Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts answer burning questions Justin Ravitz and Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAYOctober 31, 2025 at 11:47 PM 0 Andrew, the former Duke of York, will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. He attended funeral services for Katharine, Duchess of Kent, at Westminster Cathedral in London on September 16, 2025.

- - Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts answer burning questions

Justin Ravitz and Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAYOctober 31, 2025 at 11:47 PM

0

Andrew, the former Duke of York, will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. He attended funeral services for Katharine, Duchess of Kent, at Westminster Cathedral in London on September 16, 2025.

Even compared to historic royal scandals such as the abdication of King Edward, Princess Diana and Charles' divorce, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle leaving the UK, this week's headlines were shocking: Prince Andrew has been formally stripped of his royal titles and evicted from his home at the Royal Lodge by order of his brother, King Charles III. The announcement followed a deafening chorus about his links to Jeffrey Epstein, sex trafficking and the sexual abuse of young women, including the late Virginia Giufffre.

Until King Charles took that step, "this was the most dangerous moment in royal history for 100 years," Andrew Lownie, who has written several books on the royal family, including Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, tells USA TODAY. "Here was a royal who was corrupt and who was supported by the institution itself. And the public were absolutely furious." The former Duke of York's story is far from over, and the latest development only highlights new and unanswered questions about the intertwined fates of Andrew, his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, their daughters, Beatrice and Eugenie, King Charles and the monarchy itself. Here, USA TODAY explores some of the most pressing issues, with the help of royal insiders and experts.

Will Andrew be investigated by authorities?

"Absolutely. I think the public mood wants law enforcement agencies to look at him properly, because there have been fudges in the past," Lownie predicts.

"There's also this attempt to basically influence a government official by trying to smear Virginia Giuffre," he says. An email obtained by Britain's Daily Mail newspaper, and published earlier in October, claimed that Andrew asked his Metropolitan Police bodyguard to investigate Virginia Giuffre shortly before her accusations against him were made public in 2021.

The newspaper reported that Andrew passed British police Giuffre's date of birth, U.S. social security number and suggested she had a criminal record. Andrew has not publicly responded to the accusation. The Metropolitan Police said they were looking into the claims. Dai Davies, the former head of royal protection for the British monarchy and now a royal commentator, says that if the Mail's report turns out to be accurate then it means Andrew committed a criminal offense.Says Lownie: "Misconduct in public office, which carries life imprisonment, could be what they bring against him, quite apart from the sex trafficking allegations."

1 / 22Victims of Jeffrey Epstein rally at Capitol Hill to demand release of filesRep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) speaks during a news conference with alleged victims of disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein outside the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 3, 2025 in Washington, DC.Could authorities in the U.S. — Congress or the FBI — question him?

"The FBI have long wanted to talk to him and he refused to cooperate, as indeed noted by the victims' lawyers and others. There may be a renewed resolve to talk to him. He may fight it," Lownie says. Lownie believes there is "plenty of evidence that he's broken the law" that would justify a U.S. investigation, but it remains to be seen if the Department of Justice under President Trump would pursue the case.

Why did King Charles III make this decision now?

"He absolutely had to if the monarchy is to be a symbol of national unity, if it's to actually function," says royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams. Giuffre's posthumously published book Nobody's Girl put tremendous pressure on the royal family, he adds: "The royal family advertises themselves as purveyors of soft power, and they've done it brilliantly. [But] when you go to the Vatican and pray with the Pope, and it's overshadowed by a scandal that has gone back 15 years and gets worse and worse," Charles was left with no other option.

Lownie also believes stripping Andrew's title might have staunched the bleeding—for now. "They were worried what else might come out," adds Lownie. "They know that some of the victims are now much more emboldened to speak out. It was better to cut loose at this stage." In short, he adds, "They can basically wash their hands of him and he's going to be left to sink or swim."Davies said while he has no new specific information about the allegations against Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, as he is now officially known, he strongly suspects the king believes there could be further damaging revelations "coming their way."

What was King Charles and Prince Andrew's relationship like?

"I don't think the two of them had a great deal in common, because Charles was extremely intellectual, as well as being amazingly physical when it came to sport," Fitzwilliams says. Andrew, 65, is viewed "very much a sort of 'bovine' type," he says, using the British slang for someone who is slow or stupid, i.e. like a cow. "He's someone with all these silly jokes and so forth that wouldn't appeal to Charles…They're so different."

The royal scandal sparked outrage among the British public, and plenty of headlines on October 31, 2025, announced Andrew was being stripped of his royal titles.Did Prince William have any input into his father's decision?

While the Palace has officially said it was Charles' decision alone, Fitzwiliam says he's "absolutely convinced" that heir apparent William, seeing the decline in public support for the monarchy in the UK., weighed in and saw the institution "threatened" by the mounting scandal.

Could Andrew go to jail?

"There are a whole series of charges that could be leveled at him with good evidence," says Lownie. "If the authorities properly investigate him, there's a good chance charges will be brought and he may well be found guilty and go to prison."

While Lownie predicts prison could be "very likely" for Andrew, it is extremely rare for members of the British royal family to be accused or convicted of criminal offenses. Princess Anne—sister to the King and Andrew—became the first member of the British royal family to be convicted of a criminal offense in 2002 after one of her dogs, a three-year-old English bull terrier named Dotty, bit two children in Windsor Great Park. (She pled guilty and paid a fine.)

Sarah Ferguson (at Easter Matins Service in April) is a "material witness" to the scandal, Lownie says.What is Sarah Ferguson's involvement and what will she do next?

The former Duchess of York and her ex-husband remained close and even lived together, but she will no longer receive royal support. "Her daughters might have to help in supporting her, because she's lost all her patronages," says Fitzwilliams. "She ran a very, very well-organized PR campaign" to get back in the public's good graces, but those rehabilitation efforts "been completely destroyed. She won't bounce back from this."

Lownie agrees, citing Ferguson's close ties to Epstein that a recently unearthed email suggests. "She was staying with Epstein, at one of the Epstein flats, four years after she claimed publicly to have broken contact," he says. "She was down in Palm Beach, she was always with him in New York. This relationship has kind of been ignored with the focus on Jeffrey and Andrew, so she's kind of slipped in under the radar."

The former duchess could face legal issues of her own, he adds: "I think she's certainly a material witness to what was going on. She must have seen what was going on. I think she's very much in the frame—another reason why they've cast her adrift."

Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie will retain their titles after Andrew Windsor, the former Prince Andrew, was officially stripped of his.Will Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice continue to perform royal duties?

While the Palace confirmed Eugenie and Beatrice will retain their titles, "It's very difficult to see" either of them leading high-profile royal events in the wake of their father's disgrace and legal peril, Fitzwilliams says. "Of course, they shouldn't be blamed. They seem well-adjusted. They've got careers, happy families as far as I know, and they want to do bits for charity. They shouldn't be stopped" from that philanthropy. Unfortunately, he doesn't see "charities queuing up" to work with them in the wake of the scandal. "I do hope people will look at this in as reasonable a way as possible."

Why is Andrew still in the line of succession?

Yes, but not in an actionable way. "In reality, it doesn't matter, because only working royals could succeed [to the throne]," says Fitzwilliams. Andrew hasn't been a working royal since 2019. To remove Andrew from the official line, Fitzwilliams says, would require "a lot of parliamentary time on technicality."

Andrew, with his siblings, Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex, King Charles III and Anne, Princess Royal, at Queen Elizabeth's funeral in September 2022. He was not permitted to wear his military uniform because he was no longer a working royal.Will Andrew appear at any public functions again?

It's reported that Andrew will live in a house on the royal family's Sandringham estate, but will not be included in the family's Christmas celebration. "The same goes for Easter," Fitzwilliams says. "The only thing you can't keep him out of is a funeral. I think we would see him slip into the side door and slip out."

Can the British monarchy survive this?

With Charles' decision, "They're not out of the woods yet, but they've appeased a lot of the public anger," Lownie surmises. "They've shown that they care about the victims. But things can still go wrong. I kind of feel the mood is that Andrew needs to pay some sort of penalty for this. And if that involves him going to prison, then I think that would be quite popular. The sense that elites haven't gotten away with it, that they are accountable, would send out a very strong message that people would be very happy with."

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts weigh in

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: October 31, 2025 at 07:00PM on Source: COSMOPOLITE

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts answer burning questions

Could Prince Andrew go to jail? Royal experts answer burning questions Justin Ravitz and Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAYOcto...
New Photo - Where Will Ex-Prince Andrew Live After Being Stripped of His Titles? What to Know About His New Residence, Sandringham Estate

Where Will ExPrince Andrew Live After Being Stripped of His Titles? What to Know About His New Residence, Sandringham Estate Samantha StutsmanOctober 31, 2025 at 8:33 PM 3 Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty ; Radcliffe/BauerGriffin/GC Images Prince Andrew in 2025; Sandringham House. In October 2025, the former Prince Andrew announced he would no longer use his royal titles and honors He has been ordered to vacate the Royal Lodge — his home of more than 20 years Andrew will move to an undisclosed property on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, England The former Prince Andrew is packing up for a royal chang...

- - Where Will Ex-Prince Andrew Live After Being Stripped of His Titles? What to Know About His New Residence, Sandringham Estate

Samantha StutsmanOctober 31, 2025 at 8:33 PM

3

Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty ; Radcliffe/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images

Prince Andrew in 2025; Sandringham House. -

In October 2025, the former Prince Andrew announced he would no longer use his royal titles and honors

He has been ordered to vacate the Royal Lodge — his home of more than 20 years

Andrew will move to an undisclosed property on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk, England

The former Prince Andrew is packing up for a royal change of address.

On Oct. 30, King Charles stripped his brother of all his royal titles, including "Prince."

"His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the Style, Titles and Honours of Prince Andrew," the palace said in the statement. "Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor."

The former Duke of York — the second son of Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip — once stood second in line to the throne, behind King Charles. Now, no longer an active member of the royal family, he has spent recent years grappling with the public and legal repercussions of his association with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, including Virginia Giuffre's sexual assault lawsuit, which was privately settled in February 2022.

Following the removal of Andrew's royal titles, he was also instructed to vacate the Royal Lodge — a 30-room residence in Windsor Great Park that has been his home since 2003.

He is expected to relocate to a property on the Sandringham Estate, with his new accommodations being privately financed by King Charles. The exact location among the estate's roughly 150 properties remains undisclosed.

Here's everything to know about Sandringham Estate, including why it was one of Queen Elizabeth's most cherished retreats.

Sandringham Estate is located in Norfolk, England

David Goddard/Getty

Aerial view of the Sandringham Estate.

Roughly a three-and-a-half-hour drive (100 miles) from Buckingham Palace in London, the Sandringham Estate is located in Norfolk, England.

The estate serves primarily as a country retreat for the royal family. King Charles stayed there while undergoing cancer treatment and the late Queen famously spent her winter months at the residence.

Sandringham Estate has been a royal residence since 1862

Central Press/Hulton Archive/Getty

The royal family relaxing in the drawing room at Sandringham House in 1969.

Sandringham has been part of the royal family's private residences since 1862, when Queen Victoria purchased the estate for her son, Albert Edward, the Prince of Wales — later King Edward VII — and his soon-to-be wife, Princess Alexandra of Denmark, per Visit Norfolk.

When King Edward VII died in 1910, ownership passed to his son, King George V, and later to George's eldest son, King Edward VIII. After King Edward VIII's abdication in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson, the property was passed to his brother, King George VI.

Following King George VI's death in 1952, Sandringham became the country home of Queen Elizabeth. Upon her death in 2022, it was inherited by King Charles.

There are 150 properties on the Sandringham Estate

Radcliffe/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images The Church of St. Mary Magdalene on the Sandringham Estate.

Sandringham Estate is sprawling, covering around 20,000 acres and featuring 150 properties, including the iconic Sandringham House and its 60 acres of formal gardens, according to the estate's official website.

Many of the smaller houses on the estate — such as York Cottage, Gardens House, The Folly and Wood Farm — are occupied by staff or rented out, while others serve as farmhouses supporting the estate's agricultural operations.

Meanwhile, in 2011, Queen Elizabeth gifted Prince William and Kate Middleton Anmer Hall, a 10-bedroom Georgian country house on the larger estate, to celebrate their wedding. The couple and their children often spend school breaks, weekends and holidays there.

Sandringham Estate employs more than 200 people

Julian Parker/UK Press via Getty

King Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry on bikes at the Sandringham Estate.

The Sandringham Estate blends royal living with active land management and agriculture. At its core, the estate runs a large-scale farming operation: the Farms Department oversees around 2,000 Aberfield sheep and Shorthorn crossbreed cattle, plus the production of crops such as wheat, barley and beans.

In addition to farming, the estate supports a sawmill, which processes timber from its woodlands for construction, maintenance and other estate needs. Another unique operation is the estate's apple juice pressing plant, which produces juice from fruits grown in Sandringham's orchards, often sold locally or used in estate events.

More than 200 staff members are employed across these various operations.

Sandringham Estate was beloved by Queen Elizabeth

Ron Bell/PA Images via Getty

Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip on the grounds of Sandringham House.

Sandringham Estate held a special place in the late Queen's heart for many reasons. It was her private country retreat, offering a peaceful escape from the public demands of royal life, where she spent her winter months enjoying her passions, horse riding and observing wildlife.

The estate also had deep family significance, hosting generations of royal gatherings and celebrations. Notably, it was Sandringham where she delivered her first Christmas broadcast to the nation in 1952.

Princess Diana was born on the Sandringham Estate

Tim Graham Photo Library via Getty

Prince Charles, Prince Harry and Princess Diana at the Sandringham Estate.

On July 1, 1961, Princess Diana was born at Park House on the Sandringham Estate. She lived there during her early childhood until 1975, when her family moved to Althorp House — the Spencer family's ancestral home in Northamptonshire.

Sandringham Estate is open to visitors

John Shelley Collection/Avalon/Getty

The Sandringham Museum

At Sandringham Estate, visitors can tour the historic gardens and house — and for a truly immersive experience, stay on the grounds.

The gardens at Sandringham were first opened to the public in 1908 by King Edward VII. In 1977, Queen Elizabeth opened Sandringham House itself during her Silver Jubilee, allowing guests to tour the royal residence.

Today, the estate welcomes visitors seven days a week from March through October, providing access to Sandringham House, the gardens, St. Mary Magdalene Church and the estate's museum, per the website. For those wishing to extend their visit, overnight stays are available at The Folly and the Gardens House.

on People

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: October 31, 2025 at 07:00PM on Source: COSMOPOLITE

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Where Will Ex-Prince Andrew Live After Being Stripped of His Titles? What to Know About His New Residence, Sandringham Estate

Where Will ExPrince Andrew Live After Being Stripped of His Titles? What to Know About His New Residence, Sandringha...
New Photo - Trump's push to resume nuclear testing 'immediately' is unrealistic and could backfire, experts say

Trump's push to resume nuclear testing 'immediately' is unrealistic and could backfire, experts say Gordon LuboldOctober 31, 2025 at 11:36 PM 0 President Donald Trump said this week that he wants the Defense Department to begin testing nuclear weapons "immediately," but experts say that's wishful thinking. The U.S. has only one location where such testing could take place, an underground facility at the former Nevada Nuclear Test Site near Las Vegas. Preparing the site for testing would require hundreds of millions of dollars and at least two years, nuclear experts said.

- - Trump's push to resume nuclear testing 'immediately' is unrealistic and could backfire, experts say

Gordon LuboldOctober 31, 2025 at 11:36 PM

0

President Donald Trump said this week that he wants the Defense Department to begin testing nuclear weapons "immediately," but experts say that's wishful thinking.

The U.S. has only one location where such testing could take place, an underground facility at the former Nevada Nuclear Test Site near Las Vegas. Preparing the site for testing would require hundreds of millions of dollars and at least two years, nuclear experts said.

"There is no immediacy when it comes to testing," Gregory Jaczko, former chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said on "Meet the Press" Thursday.

Trump announced his desire to conduct nuclear tests in a Truth Social post shortly before his meeting this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping in South Korea.

"Because of other countries testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis," Trump wrote Wednesday. "That process will begin immediately."

Some nuclear weapons experts argue that the U.S. has no technical need to restart nuclear testing and that it could actually wind up benefitting countries like China, because it would in effect give them license to resume testing to advance their less-developed nuclear programs.

The U.S. has conducted 1,054 nuclear weapons tests overall, but none since 1992. China, by comparison, has conducted 47 nuclear tests. If the U.S. were to resume nuclear weapons testing, and China used that as an opening for doing the same, it could help Beijing with weapon design and allow them to expand their own arsenal, experts say.

"Among the big nuclear weapon states, there's one country that would benefit the most from resumed testing — that's China," William Alberque, former director of NATO's Arms Control, Disarmament and WMD Non-Proliferation Centre, said in an interview.

Alberque said Trump's intentions are unclear, but the sudden directive could be an attempt to pressure Russia into a new nonproliferation agreement.

"The U.S. and Russia have all the data they need to build whatever nuclear weapon they need," he added. "There's no new science in nuclear weapons design" when it comes to their arsenals.

Trump noted in the Wednesday Truth Social post that Russia and China are gaining on the U.S. in the number of nuclear weapons in their arsenal.

After his meeting with Xi, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that his order "had to do with others," adding that "they seem to all be nuclear testing."

"We don't do testing," Trump said. "We've halted it years, many years ago. But with others doing testing, I think it's appropriate that we do also."

Nuclear explosive testing in the U.S. would be carried out by the Department of Energy. The Defense Department would handle the testing of vehicle systems – the weapons used to deliver nuclear weapons, similar to what Russia has carried out recently.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Friday while traveling in Asia that the Pentagon would work with the Energy Department to resume testing, but he did not acknowledge the time it would take to do so.

"The president was clear, we need to have a credible nuclear deterrent," he told reporters in Kuala Lumpur. "That is the baseline of our deterrence, and so having an understanding and resuming testing is a pretty responsible, very responsible way to do that."

"We're moving out quickly," Hegseth added, "and America will ensure that we have the strongest, most capable nuclear arsenal so that we maintain peace through strength."

Resuming testing would violate the terms of the 1996 Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, signed by the U.S. and 186 other countries.

It bans all nuclear explosions, whether for military or peaceful purposes, with the goal of curbing all nuclear arms proliferation. According to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, the treaty also "prevents the serious health and environmental impacts of nuclear tests."

Trump appeared to be drawing a page from Project 2025, a blueprint for his administration's agenda that was crafted by the conservative Heritage Foundation. It recommends rejecting the ratification of the 1996 treaty and pushing for conducting nuclear tests "in response to adversary nuclear developments if necessary."

Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, an advocacy group in Washington, D.C., said there is no public evidence yet of any other country conducting such tests, and the only country known to do so is North Korea. It carried out a test in 2017.

Kimball pointed out that Brandon Williams, the Trump-appointed head of the National Nuclear Security Administration, stated during testimony in April that there was no reason to resume testing.

"The United States continues to observe its 1992 nuclear test moratorium; and, since 1992, has assessed that the deployed nuclear stockpile remains safe, secure and effective without nuclear explosive testing," Williams testified.

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Breaking"

Read More


Source: Breaking

Published: October 31, 2025 at 06:54PM on Source: COSMOPOLITE

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Trump's push to resume nuclear testing 'immediately' is unrealistic and could backfire, experts say

Trump 's push to resume nuclear testing 'immediately' is unrealistic and could backfire, experts say Gordo...
New Photo - Teyana Taylor's Daring Red Carpet Look Ignites Online Debate Over The 'Revealing Dress' Trend

Teyana Taylor's Daring Red Carpet Look Ignites Online Debate Over The 'Revealing Dress' Trend Abel Musa MiñoOctober 31, 2025 at 10:45 PM 0 Teyana Taylor, the 34yearold singer known for her awardwinning performance in A Thousand and One, became the talk of the night at Thursday's TIME100 Next 2025 gala in New York City. She arrived wearing what many online described as one of the most daring red carpet looks of the year, with a sheer black creation from Haider Ackermann for Tom Ford's Spring 2026 collection.

- - Teyana Taylor's Daring Red Carpet Look Ignites Online Debate Over The 'Revealing Dress' Trend

Abel Musa MiñoOctober 31, 2025 at 10:45 PM

0

Teyana Taylor, the 34-year-old singer known for her award-winning performance in A Thousand and One, became the talk of the night at Thursday's TIME100 Next 2025 gala in New York City.

She arrived wearing what many online described as one of the most daring red carpet looks of the year, with a sheer black creation from Haider Ackermann for Tom Ford's Spring 2026 collection.

The look, which walked the runway just last month, was held up by a single, narrow strap running up the center of her torso and wrapping around her neck. Beneath the transparent fabric, a high-waisted thong was completely visible.

"Did the US run out of tape?" a user on X wrote, echoing the sentiments of many who were put off by the outfit.

Teyana Taylor turned heads at the Next 2025 gala in a dress that left little to the imagination

Image credits: Getty/Michael Loccisano

Taylor paired the see-through skirt with an open black blazer, leaving her midsection fully exposed. Her hair and makeup were kept minimal, letting the outfit speak for itself.

The performer, who has been traveling internationally to promote her new Hulu series All's Fair, has never been one to play it safe on the red carpet, with examples ranging from her corseted Thom Browne look at the 2023 Met Gala to her sculptural Christopher John Rogers gown at the CFDA Awards.

Image credits: Getty/XNY/Star Max

But Thursday's appearance marked a new level of boldness even for her.

"Her body is insane," one commenter wrote. "That is a very daring, risqué look, but she can definitely pull it off."

Teyana Taylor is suited up for the TIME100 Event. 🖤 pic.twitter.com/Or8TjpBqfq

— Entertainment Tonight (@etnow) October 31, 2025

Others were far less forgiving. "Beautiful woman," another said. "But the 'look' screams desperation."

While fans praised her confidence, critics called the look a publicity stunt meant to dominate headlines ahead of her show's release.

The dress is part of a larger trend of female celebrities opting for revealing, form-fitting outfits for high-level events

Image credits: Getty/Kristina Bumphrey

Taylor's look comes amid what fashion outlets such as Vogue and WWD have described as the growing popularity of revealing, semi-translucent, and form-fitting dresses.

The red-carpet trend is defined by sheer fabrics and exposed silhouettes. Once dominated by illusion mesh and sequins in the 2010s, it has now evolved toward full transparency, embraced by stars like Florence Pugh, Dua Lipa, and Julia Fox.

On Oscars Night, More Celebrities Tried the Nearly Nude Look💃

Julia Fox followed up Bianca Censori's much-discussed Grammys moment with a sheer dress at Vanity Fair's party. Others joined her in the less-is-more approach.

1/ At Vanity Fair's Oscars after-party on Sunday night,… pic.twitter.com/x7vnjf3pDK

— Shadow Prince (@AnimeAlchemy24) March 4, 2025

Taylor joined a growing roster of celebrities embracing the aesthetic this week alone.

Former Vice President Kamala Harris's stepdaughter Ella Emhoff attended the Wall Street Journal Innovator Awards in a sheer lace Helsa gown, while Sydney Sweeney turned heads at Variety's Power of Women event in a translucent corset dress by Christian Cowan.

Image credits: Getty/Mike Coppola

At the same time, Kristen Stewart appeared in Los Angeles wearing a see-through lace piece by Rhea Costa.

Dakota Johnson, seen as one of the movement's most consistent supporters, recognized the backlash the trend has received from a segment of the audience, who long for a time of more elegant and conservative looking outfits, but dismissed it altogether.

"I really don't care," she told Vogue Germany. "If I find a beautiful dress that I feel comfortable in, of course I want to wear it."

Taylor's appearance was part of a larger fashion shift toward body exposure as a form of elegance

Image credits: Getty/Gilbert Carrasquillo

Online, however, the reactions were as expected for these types of outfits. The look divided audiences almost instantly, drawing everything from admiration to open disgust.

"Poor girl. So desperate for attention," one user wrote.

"Good grief," another replied.

"She can definitely pull [the look] off," countered a fan. "She has a great body."

"I thought it was a Halloween costume at first," another added. "No class."

Image credits: Getty/Frazer Harrison

"She's no Sydney Sweeney…" a viewer argued.

Others decided to find humor in the trend.

"This makes Victoria's Secret look demure and tasteful," one joked. "This is corner-of-the-street wear."

Whether the trend continues or fades away remains to be seen, but one thing is for certain, it will continue to divide viewers.

"Not classy." Netizens debated whether these types of dresses were appropriate

Image credits: jreentertain

Image credits: XKingxGrizzlyX7

Image credits: KingSmoove009

Image credits: LSupclose

Image credits: ShadowSnake164

Image credits: RobinVP85

Image credits: Gastelum241

Image credits: lwaits4u

Image credits: AzNani11

Original Article on Source

Source: "AOL Entertainment"

Read More


Source: Entertainment

Published: October 31, 2025 at 06:09PM on Source: COSMOPOLITE

#ShowBiz#Sports#Celebrities#Lifestyle

Teyana Taylor’s Daring Red Carpet Look Ignites Online Debate Over The ‘Revealing Dress’ Trend

Teyana Taylor's Daring Red Carpet Look Ignites Online Debate Over The 'Revealing Dress' Trend Abel Musa ...

 

COSMO NEWS © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com